Matthew Lorincz

Professor

Research Classification

Developmental Genetics
Genomics

Research Interests

Epigenetics
chromatin
Development
Epigenomics
Gene regulation

Relevant Degree Programs

 

Research Methodology

ChIPseq
WGBS
RNAseq
CRISPR
mouse KO

Recruitment

Complete these steps before you reach out to a faculty member!

Check requirements
  • Familiarize yourself with program requirements. You want to learn as much as possible from the information available to you before you reach out to a faculty member. Be sure to visit the graduate degree program listing and program-specific websites.
  • Check whether the program requires you to seek commitment from a supervisor prior to submitting an application. For some programs this is an essential step while others match successful applicants with faculty members within the first year of study. This is either indicated in the program profile under "Requirements" or on the program website.
Focus your search
  • Identify specific faculty members who are conducting research in your specific area of interest.
  • Establish that your research interests align with the faculty member’s research interests.
    • Read up on the faculty members in the program and the research being conducted in the department.
    • Familiarize yourself with their work, read their recent publications and past theses/dissertations that they supervised. Be certain that their research is indeed what you are hoping to study.
Make a good impression
  • Compose an error-free and grammatically correct email addressed to your specifically targeted faculty member, and remember to use their correct titles.
    • Do not send non-specific, mass emails to everyone in the department hoping for a match.
    • Address the faculty members by name. Your contact should be genuine rather than generic.
  • Include a brief outline of your academic background, why you are interested in working with the faculty member, and what experience you could bring to the department. The supervision enquiry form guides you with targeted questions. Ensure to craft compelling answers to these questions.
  • Highlight your achievements and why you are a top student. Faculty members receive dozens of requests from prospective students and you may have less than 30 seconds to pique someone’s interest.
  • Demonstrate that you are familiar with their research:
    • Convey the specific ways you are a good fit for the program.
    • Convey the specific ways the program/lab/faculty member is a good fit for the research you are interested in/already conducting.
  • Be enthusiastic, but don’t overdo it.
Attend an information session

G+PS regularly provides virtual sessions that focus on admission requirements and procedures and tips how to improve your application.

 

Doctoral students
Postdoctoral Fellows
2020
  • Role of epigenetics in male and female germline development
  • Role of retroelements in gene regulation
  • Interplay between epigenetic marks and DNA methylation in the early embryo
I am open to hosting Visiting International Research Students (non-degree, up to 12 months).

Graduate Student Supervision

Doctoral Student Supervision (Jan 2008 - May 2019)
Interphase histone H3 serine 10 phosphorylation in mouse embryonic stem cells (2017)

Phosphorylation of histone H3 at serine 10 (H3S10ph) has been observed in two paradoxical contexts, depending on the stage of the cell cycle – it is a hallmark of condensed mitotic chromatin, but is also found at specific mitogen-inducible genic promoters and distal enhancers. In the work presented in this thesis, I derived a mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) line harbouring an endogenous fluorescent cell cycle reporter (FUCCI) in combination with next-generation sequencing to comprehensively map H3S10ph at distinct stages of the mammalian cell cycle and examined the crosstalk between this mark and the repressive mark, H3K9me. I found that H3S10ph broadly demarcates gene-rich, early-replicating euchromatic regions in G1, marking up to 30% of the ESC genome. Reminiscent of H3S10ph deposited by JIL-1 kinase in Drosophila, interphase H3S10ph pervasively marks gene-dense regions to prevent the accumulation of H3K9me2 at actively transcribed genes in ESCs. In contrast to H3S10ph at euchromatin, mitotic phosphorylation mediated by Aurora kinase is also detectable in ESCs in G1 at young endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), specifically in combination with H3K9me3. Finally, to identify the kinases responsible for interphase H3S10ph, I generated knockout (KO) ESC lines of serine kinases homologous to JIL-1, including Msk1/2 and Rsk1/2/3/4. Msk2-/- ESCs showed the greatest loss of interphase H3S10ph at active promoter/enhancers. Furthermore, known H3K9me3 repressed targets, including imprinted genes, young ERVs and germline genes, were downregulated in MSK2-deficient cells. Taken together, this work revealed that H3S10ph plays a previously unappreciated role in interphase chromatin architecture and facilitates appropriate genic transcription by countering the repressive effects exerted by H3K9 methyltransferases.

View record

Characterization of the disease pathogenesis of Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia (2016)

Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia (SIOD) is a rare autosomal recessive multisystemic disorder characterized by disproportionate short stature due to skeletal dysplasia, renal disease due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), T-cell immunodeficiency, and vascular disease. SIOD is caused by mutations in the SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily A-like 1 (SMARCAL1) gene, which encodes for a DNA annealing helicase with roles in DNA replication, DNA repair, and gene expression. Although SMARCAL1 functions to maintain genomic integrity, it is not known how SMARCAL1 deficiency leads to the various clinical features of SIOD. My aim was therefore to characterize the molecular pathogenesis of the dental, vascular, renal, and immune features. Given that SMARCAL1 has a role in modulating gene expression and that phenotypic changes are typically preceded by changes in gene expression, I hypothesized that SMARCAL1 deficiency pathologically alters the expression of key genes that lead to the clinical features of SIOD. To test this, SIOD patient tissues were studied using molecular biological analyses. With respect to vascular disease, an SIOD aorta had decreased expression of elastin, and both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms contributed to the elastin deficiency. Elastin is critical for the structural integrity of the arteries and its deficiency is a known cause of vascular disease. With respect to renal disease, SIOD glomeruli have increased expression and activation of the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways. Wnt and Notch signaling are required for kidney development and the postnatal reactivation of these pathways is an established cause of FSGS. With respect to immune disease, SIOD T cells have decreased mRNA and protein expression of interleukin 7 receptor alpha chain (IL7R). IL7R is critical for T-cell development and its deficiency is a known cause of T-cell immunodeficiency. In conclusion, the gene expression alterations detected are known causes of disease and differ among the tissues studied. These findings suggest that SMARCAL1 deficiency may cause each disease feature by tissue-specific gene expression changes. Further studies are required to define the mechanism of how SMARCAL1 deficiency alters the expression of these genes.

View record

Transcriptional repression of retrotransposons in mouse germline (2016)

Transcription of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) is inhibited by de novo DNA methylation during gametogenesis, a process initiated after birth in oocytes and at approximately embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5) in prospermatogonia. However earlier in germline development, the genome, including most retrotransposons, is progressively demethylated. As DNA methylation reaches a low point in E13.5 primordial germ cells (PGCs) of both sexes, raising the question whether repressive histone methylations play a role in silencing of retrotransposons at this stage of development. To answer this question, I first focused on developing low input assays for profiling histone modifications, DNA methylation and transcription from rare cell populations. In close collaboration with Dr. Julie Brind’Amour, I was able to develop the “SmallCell” protocol package, which enables chromatin immunoprecipitation, bisulfite conversion of DNA, RNA isolation-reverse transcription using ~1000 cells per assay, but also construction of sequencing library from pictograms of DNA. This allows profiling of epigenetic information at both locus-specific and genome-wide scales. I then developed the “InterSeq” software (R package) to intersect and explore different types of epigenomic data. This package allows converting sequencing data into genomic interval measures in spreadsheet (SeqData), interfacing this spreadsheet into flowcytometry data (SeqFrame), and an intuitive graphical interface to gate and explore the inter-relationship between different types of epigenomic sequencing data similar to flowcytometry (SeqViz). With these tools we first determined whether retrotransposons are marked by H3K9me3 and H3K27me3. Although these repressive histone modifications are found predominantly on distinct genomic regions in E13.5 PGCs, they concurrently mark partially methylated long terminal repeats and LINE1 elements. Germline-specific conditional knockout of the H3K9 methyltransferase SETDB1 yields a decrease of both marks and DNA methylation at H3K9me3-enriched retrotransposon families. Strikingly, Setdb1 knockout E13.5 PGCs show concomitant derepression of many marked ERVs, including IAP, ETn, and ERVK10C elements, and ERV-proximal genes, a subset in a sex-dependent manner. Furthermore, Setdb1 deficiency is associated with a reduced number of male E13.5 PGCs and postnatal hypogonadism in both sexes. Taken together, these observations reveal that SETDB1 is an essential guardian against proviral expression prior to the onset of de novo DNA methylation in the germline.

View record

Transcriptional silencing of endogenous retroviruses by the novel lysine methyltransferase co-repressor hnRNP K (2016)

Histone lysine methylation is essential for mammalian development and maintenance of somatic cell identity, as evidenced by a group of Mendelian diseases and cancers linked with mutations in lysine methyltransferases (KMTs). The transcriptional silencing of a class of retrotransposons known as endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) in murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs) provides a unique model system in which to investigate epigenetic regulation by the H3K9 family of KMTs and characterize novel molecular mechanisms of relevance to human biology and disease. In mESCs, class I and II ERVs are silenced by the SETDB1/KAP1 complex, which deposits histone H3K9 trimethylation (H3K9me3). In contrast, class III MERVL ERVs are silenced by the G9a/ GLP complex, which deposits H3K9me2. The molecular mechanisms governing the recruitment of these KMTs to their genomic ERV targets remain poorly understood. The goal of this work was to identify and characterize novel factors that regulate the functions of these KMTs in ERV silencing. In the first part of my thesis work, I identified the RNA-binding protein and transcription factor hnRNP K as a novel co-repressor for the SETDB1/KAP1 complex. HnRNP K coordinates recruitment of the KMT SETDB1 by KAP1 to its ERV targets. This function of hnRNP K involves a previously uncharacterized influence on the levels of chromatin protein SUMOylation. In the second part of my thesis work, I demonstrated that MERVL elements are also repressed by hnRNP K and can remain inactive in the absence of H3K9me2, likely due to the lack of transcriptional activators. HnRNP K forms a novel RNA-dependent complex with G9a/GLP, is required for global H3K9me2 and provides a repressive barrier to MERVL expression in the presence and absence of H3K9me2. Taken together my work has provided significant insights into the epigenetic repression of ERV transcription by KMTs and demonstrates that hnRNP K is a novel co-repressor for two different KMT complexes. As recent studies have linked mutations in HNRNPK to the novel Mendelian disorder Au-Kline syndrome and cancer, these insights should also guide future studies on the role of hnRNP K in regulation of KMT-mediated signaling pathways in human disease.

View record

Transcriptional silencing of endogenous retroviruses : interplay between histone H3K9 methylation and DNA methylation (2012)

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are found in genomes of all higher eukaryotes. As retrotransposition is deleterious, pathways have evolved to repress these retroelements. While DNA methylation transcriptionally represses ERVs in differentiated cells, this epigenetic mark is dispensable for maintaining proviral silencing during early stages of mouse embryogenesis and in embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Studies in diverse species have found histone H3K9 methylation and DNA methylation to function together to repress retrotransposons. However, until recently, little was known about the role of this histone modification in proviral silencing in mESCs. Interestingly, our analysis of mESCs lacking G9a, an H3K9-specific lysine methyltransferase (KMTase) revealed that although ERVs lost H3K9 di-methylation (me2) and DNA methylation, they remained silent. Strikingly, the levels of H3K9 tri-methylation (me3) remained unaltered, suggesting that this mark may instead be responsible for maintaining these parasitic elements transcriptionally inactive. The first stage of my research focused on identifying the enzyme depositing H3K9me3 at ERVs and on determining its role in proviral silencing. I discovered that Setdb1, another H3K9-specific KMTase, was indeed depositing H3K9me3 at a subset of ERVs and was required for maintaining transcriptional repression. Interestingly, this silencing pathway operated independently of DNA methylation. Through collaboration, we also discovered that this pathway played a diminished role in differentiated cells. Taken together, these findings indicate the existence of a DNA methylation-independent proviral silencing pathway in mESCs. The second stage of my research focused on the establishment of transcriptional repression of newly integrated proviruses. By employing an exogenous retroviral construct, I discovered a dramatic silencing defect in mESCs lacking G9a, which phenocopied cells depleted of the de novo DNA methyltransferases. Furthermore, efficient DNA methylation of proviruses required G9a-mediated H3K9me2. These findings reveal that histone modifications and DNA methylation function in concert to defend the genome against invading retroviral elements in mESCs. Taken together with discoveries regarding the mechanism of DNA demethylation in early embryos, I propose that cells undergoing DNA methylation reprogramming predominantly employ histone modification-based pathways to maintain these parasitic elements in a silent state; however, the establishment of transcriptional repression for newly integrated elements also requires de novo DNA methylation.

View record

Master's Student Supervision (2010 - 2018)
Analysis of the mechanism of maintenance of the H3K27 trimethylation mark using a novel chromatin targeting system (2012)

Chromatin replication during cell division must be accurately orchestrated to ensure genetic and epigenetic information is transmitted to cell progeny. Upon cell division, newly synthesized histones assemble onto the newly formed chromatin to replace the disassociated parental histones. As these newly synthesized histones do not contain the same post-translational modifications as their adjacent parental histones, these modifications must be recapitulated after each cell division. The trimethylation of lysine 27 (K27me3) on histone H3 is associated with transcriptional repression, and is deposited by EZH2, a member of the PRC2 complex. Using a Gal4 DNA binding domain (Gal4DBD) fused to EZH2 coupled with FLP/FRT-based deletion of a gal4 binding site cassette, I provide evidence that, once established, the maintenance of H3K27me3 does not require the presence of the DNA binding sites necessary for the initial deposition of this mark. These results suggest that the presence of specific histone marks may be sufficient to promote reiterative deposition of the same mark on nascent histones in association with DNA replication.

View record

Publications

Current Students & Alumni

This is a small sample of students and/or alumni that have been supervised by this researcher. It is not meant as a comprehensive list.
 
 

If this is your researcher profile you can log in to the Faculty & Staff portal to update your details and provide recruitment preferences.