Katherine Huerne
Why did you decide to pursue a graduate degree?
I chose to pursue a graduate degree because of my passion for public health research to improve health outcomes for underrepresented or vulnerable populations. I believe in using evidence-based research and community-based knowledge translation methods to advocate and enact change to improve the wellbeing of these communities.
Why did you decide to study at UBC?
UBC is a world class institution which offers a renowned education. I was also drawn to the expertise and research scope of my supervisors, which was the primary reason I chose to pursue a doctoral degree.
What is it specifically, that your program offers, that attracted you?
I think the population and public heath program offers a unique blend of qualitative and quantitative pedagogy to public health approaches. Specifically, I value the reform that the School of Population and Public Health program has undergone to ensure it teaches a wide variety of perspectives, inclusive of Indigenous rights, racialized minorities and 2SLGBTQIA+ communities.
What was the best surprise about UBC or life in Vancouver?
UBC has such a beautiful campus! I was blown away by the natural surroundings and the proximity to the beach, mountains and coastline.
What aspect of your graduate program do you enjoy the most or are looking forward to with the greatest curiosity?
I am looking forward to teaching, mentoring and inspiring other students by either serving as a TA or a student mentor.
What do you see as your biggest challenge(s) in your future career?
There is indeed an implicit glass ceiling for women, racialized minorities and people with disabilities in academia. Although I am hopeful that this will change in the future, I have nonetheless felt the effects of the glass ceiling in my academic journey up until today.
What aspects of your life or career before now have best prepared you for your UBC graduate program?
Getting involved in various organizations in my undergraduate and Master's studies has certainly taught me valuable skills in time management and work-life balance. I am also grateful for the extensive opportunities I've had in the past to publish public health research, which meant that a lot of the concepts and skills learned in my degree is not new to me.
What do you like to do for fun or relaxation?
I enjoy travelling the world to learn about new cultures or attend music festivals. When I am at home, I enjoy board games, cooking, hanging out with my cats and playing different musical instruments.
What advice do you have for new graduate students?
It's important to have good time management and communication skills. Make sure to be proactive in your studies and also in getting involved on campus. For graduate students, it's especially important to network and foster connections with other researchers or community members. And finally, engage in critical reflection regularly - sometimes we lose track of the bigger picture or the meaning behind why we do the work that we do.
Learn more about Katherine's research
Understanding the impact of sex and gender in cancer research is crucial as it can influence how cancer develops, how it's diagnosed and how treatments work. However, the way these factors are analyzed is not always rigorous or well-reported. This can limit the usefulness of cancer studies. For example, researchers often don't define what they mean by "sex" (as biological attributes) or "gender" (as social norms). Many studies also fail to separate the effects of sex apart from other factors like age, which is important for accurate statistical analysis. Most importantly, studies often don’t discuss gender-based factors that could be associated with differences in prognosis or treatment effectiveness. The current guidelines for sex/gender analysis are too general and don't address these nuances for the cancer context. This project aims to fill this gap by creating evidence-based guidelines for analyzing sex and gender differences across different contexts of cancer research. First, existing policy guidelines will be reviewed to understand how sex and gender data are used in lab research, clinical research and secondary data records. Then, a structured survey will be conducted with experts in cancer research or sex/gender-based analysis from various international and Canadian institutions. Survey questions will probe for methodological limitations of analyzing sex and gender data, such as how sex can be properly separated from gender effects in statistical analysis. Special attention will be given to developing fair data analysis practices from an intersectional approach, by incorporating considerations of gender norms/sexism, race/racism and sex and gender minorities, like intersex or transgender individuals. This project addresses a growing need to improve sex/gender analysis from an interdisciplinary approach of integrating scientific, clinical and social perspectives. In doing so, it can improve the quality and usefulness of cancer research as a whole.