Joan Sims Gould
Relevant Degree Programs
Affiliations to Research Centres, Institutes & Clusters
Complete these steps before you reach out to a faculty member!
- Familiarize yourself with program requirements. You want to learn as much as possible from the information available to you before you reach out to a faculty member. Be sure to visit the graduate degree program listing and program-specific websites.
- Check whether the program requires you to seek commitment from a supervisor prior to submitting an application. For some programs this is an essential step while others match successful applicants with faculty members within the first year of study. This is either indicated in the program profile under "Requirements" or on the program website.
- Identify specific faculty members who are conducting research in your specific area of interest.
- Establish that your research interests align with the faculty member’s research interests.
- Read up on the faculty members in the program and the research being conducted in the department.
- Familiarize yourself with their work, read their recent publications and past theses/dissertations that they supervised. Be certain that their research is indeed what you are hoping to study.
- Compose an error-free and grammatically correct email addressed to your specifically targeted faculty member, and remember to use their correct titles.
- Do not send non-specific, mass emails to everyone in the department hoping for a match.
- Address the faculty members by name. Your contact should be genuine rather than generic.
- Include a brief outline of your academic background, why you are interested in working with the faculty member, and what experience you could bring to the department. The supervision enquiry form guides you with targeted questions. Ensure to craft compelling answers to these questions.
- Highlight your achievements and why you are a top student. Faculty members receive dozens of requests from prospective students and you may have less than 30 seconds to pique someone’s interest.
- Demonstrate that you are familiar with their research:
- Convey the specific ways you are a good fit for the program.
- Convey the specific ways the program/lab/faculty member is a good fit for the research you are interested in/already conducting.
- Be enthusiastic, but don’t overdo it.
G+PS regularly provides virtual sessions that focus on admission requirements and procedures and tips how to improve your application.
Graduate Student Supervision
Doctoral Student Supervision (Jan 2008 - Nov 2019)
Mobility enables older adults to maintain their physical health, independence and participation in society. In general, mobility has predominantly been understood in functional terms. Mobility is most often measured as physical movement and/or travel behaviour. Less attention has been paid to the subjective and temporal dimensions of older adults’ mobility experiences. In addition, older adults with low incomes are under-represented in mobility research. This dissertation uses a constructivist grounded theory methodology to describe the mobility experiences of active older adults with low income. The studies within this dissertation are set in Metro Vancouver; they utilize data from a group of 6 participants selected from a cross-sectional study of 161 older adults of low income.The first study demonstrates how a novel approach (grounded visualization) can be used to explore sociospatial and temporal complexities of older adults' mobility. A grounded visualization approach can provide a deeper understanding of the multi-faceted nature of older adults' mobility experiences. Findings illustrate that time is necessary for older adults' engagement with place; familiarity influences spatial perceptions of local and distant ‘neighbourhoods’; and older adults prioritize destinations that allow them to engage in multiple activities.The second study provides an in-depth qualitative description of the mobility experiences of older adults living with low income. The following themes were found to support mobility: maintaining a sense of self, being resourceful, openness to engagement, engaging in superficial contact, experiencing social capital, accessing transportation, leaving the immediate neighbourhood and facing affordability influence active mobility choices over time.The third study adapts a mobility conceptual framework to re-frame our understanding of older adults’ mobility experiences. The adapted framework offers a physiological, subjective, contextual and temporal approach that provides a more comprehensive conceptualization of the nature and processes of older adults’ mobility. The adapted framework uses a sliding scale in order to demonstrate the fluid, multi-faceted and interrelated nature of the various elements that influence mobility over time.Taken collectively, these studies fill methodological and conceptual gaps in the literature and provide data on an understudied population. The adapted framework can be incorporated into new approaches to study older adults’ mobility.
Introduction: Physical activity (PA), the movement of one’s body, and mobility, moving one’s body through space using a variety of modes, allow older adults to participate in their communities, cultivate social connections, maintain their health, and access services. Segments of the population, however, have been overlooked. While a growing body of research has focused on older adults, we know surprisingly little about the PA and mobility of foreign-born older adults (FBOAs).Objective: This dissertation uses a focused ethnographic approach to characterize the PA and mobility of 49 visible minority FBOAs in South Vancouver, Canada. Methods: The research was conducted in Hindi, Punjabi, Cantonese, Mandarin, and English. Forty-nine participants completed surveys about their PA habits; of these 49, 46 wore accelerometers and 18 completed in-depth interviews. I also developed a novel interview tool “interactive interpreted interviews”, neighbourhood walking interviews that included professional interpreters, which 13 participants completed. Results: Participants’ mean daily step count was 7,876 (women: 8,172; men: 7,164; Chinese: 8,291; South Asian: 7,196). The bulk of their time is spent in light and sedentary activities. Physical activity is principally acquired through walking for errands and work performed in/around the home. Participants walk for physical and mental wellbeing, and have access to a supportive social environment, which includes culturally familiar and linguistically accessible shops and services.Conclusions: This study challenges the assumption that FBOAs are less active than their non-immigrant peers and confirms the role of “nonexercise” and low activity, rather than moderate to vigorous activity, in older adults’ PA acquisition. Building on the Webber (2010) model of mobility in older adults, this study also highlights how gender and personal biography, including work history and family context, impact participants’ PA and mobility behaviours.